ACAMS CAMS (Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition)) Practice Test 17

Question 160

A senior reviewer is asked to classify this pattern: A policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review steps. Which interpretation is best supported?

  1. Policies exist without executable procedures
  2. Risk appetite not embedded in customer acceptance
  3. Risk-based approach replaced by uniform control intensity
  4. Poorly differentiated geographic risk assessment

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A policy sets direction; procedures specify accountable actions, evidence, and escalation steps. The key factual distinction is between a policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review steps and the alternative pattern in which a board approves restricted correspondent banking but sales continues to onboard….

Incorrect Answers

B:

Against the reported situation in which a policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review…, an approved restriction has little effect unless screening and approval workflows enforce it. This would change the core risk being assessed from a policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review steps to a board approves restricted correspondent banking but sales continues to onboard nested-payment….

C:

The relevant alternative mechanism is different from a policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review…: Equivalent checks for materially different exposures can waste capacity and impair inclusion. The alternative requires the facts represented by a small nonprofit receives the same level of documentation demands as a complex offshore corporate…; the principal facts instead show a policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review steps.

D:

Compared with the stated facts about a policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review…, a geographic connection alone may not determine the same risk for every relationship. That mechanism is illustrated by an institution rates all foreign transactions high-risk without considering destination, customer,…, not by the stated activity involving a policy requires EDD for foreign PEPs but staff cannot find the corresponding review steps.

Question 161

During an investigative triage meeting, staff describe a case: A shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during sanctioned-region voyages. What is the most defensible characterization?

  1. Accounting records used to legitimize false turnover
  2. Tax-evasion and laundering interdependency
  3. Commingled professional-client funds exposure
  4. Maritime sanctions evasion indicators

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Reflagging and altered identifiers may hinder tracking of restricted maritime movements. The distinguishing facts concern a shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during sanctioned-region voyages; the competing interpretation would require evidence of an accountant certifies revenue for a client despite bank receipts that sharply diverge….

Incorrect Answers

A:

Compared with the stated facts about a shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during…, misstated accounts can support a laundering narrative of profits that never existed. A case of an accountant certifies revenue for a client despite bank receipts that sharply diverge from tax… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is a shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during sanctioned-region….

B:

This is not the central mechanism when a shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during…; false tax arrangements can both generate illicit savings and move funds through sham companies. The prerequisite pattern differs: a tax adviser creates repeated artificial loss-making entities whose transfers fund personal luxury…. The question instead describes a shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during sanctioned-region….

C:

When testing the contrasting pattern of a shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during…, remember that pooling obscures the origin and ownership of money moving through the intermediary. This would change the core risk being assessed from a shipping broker uses frequent last-minute vessel name and flag changes during sanctioned-region… to a bookkeeping firm pools client receipts in its own account and remits them without customer-level….

Question 162

A monitoring review identifies the following: A payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite low observed fraud exposure. What is the most specific issue the analyst should recognize?

  1. Presentation-attack vulnerability in digital identity checks
  2. Inconsistent data taxonomy and semantic mapping
  3. Control friction disproportionate to the actual threat
  4. Coverage gap across the customer control lifecycle

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Adding authentication steps to low-risk events may harm user access without meaningful control benefit. The key factual distinction is between a payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite low observed fraud… and the alternative pattern in which a remote account applicant uses a high-quality printed face photograph to defeat a simple….

Incorrect Answers

A:

When testing the contrasting pattern of a payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite…, remember that face similarity alone does not establish that a live person is present during onboarding. A case of a remote account applicant uses a high-quality printed face photograph to defeat a simple selfie… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is a payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite low observed….

B:

A field name alone may hide differences in control concepts and beneficial ownership completeness; the observed record here instead involves a payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite…. The prerequisite pattern differs: different businesses label the same beneficial-owner field as shareholder, controller, or principal…. The question instead describes a payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite low observed….

D:

The relevant alternative mechanism is different from a payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite…: Ongoing monitoring cannot replace identification and due diligence controls required when a relationship begins. The alternative requires the facts represented by a fintech buys a transaction-monitoring platform without any process for verifying customers at…; the principal facts instead show a payment app adds facial recognition to every minor account-profile change despite low observed….

Question 163

The following pattern appears in a customer risk review: A retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost all funds overseas immediately. Which underlying concern best fits the facts?

  1. Unclear high-risk offboarding governance
  2. Uncontrolled reporting trigger and timeline determination
  3. Potential money-mule pass-through activity
  4. Poor suspicious-activity report narrative quality

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Rapid onward movement with multiple unrelated senders may show use of the account as a transit point. This classification follows the described behavior; the different example of a bank decides to exit a high-risk customer while two divisions disagree about who has… would raise a different primary exposure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Against the reported situation in which a retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost…, client exits require documented decisions that consider legal restrictions and financial-crime risk. For the alternative option of unclear high-risk offboarding governance in this risk interpretation review involving a retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost all funds…, the prerequisite pattern differs: a bank decides to exit a high-risk customer while two divisions disagree about who has approval…. The question instead describes a retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost all funds….

B:

The relevant alternative mechanism is different from a retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost…: Deadlines depend on applicable law and the event that starts the statutory period. This would change the core risk being assessed from a retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost all funds… to a transaction monitoring alert is escalated after the legal deadline because investigators dispute….

D:

This is not the central mechanism when a retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost…; a report should communicate who did what, when, where, and why behavior raised concern. That mechanism is illustrated by an AML team files a report that lists transaction values but fails to explain the suspected pattern…, not by the stated activity involving a retail customer receives a series of unrelated inbound transfers and sends almost all funds….

Question 164

The financial-crime unit receives this referral: An AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a revenue-generating business line. Which risk is the referral primarily illustrating?

  1. First-line conflict in independent AML investigation
  2. Risk appetite not embedded in customer acceptance
  3. Compliance program lacks operational authority
  4. Third-line assurance independence weakness

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Written policies cannot protect the firm if staff lack independence, access, or escalation power. The specific risk is grounded in an AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a revenue-generating business line, not in the alternative scenario of a branch sales manager closes alerts that implicate the manager's own high-value clients.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This is not the central mechanism when an AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a…; business staff own transaction risk but should not independently override compliance investigation decisions. That mechanism is illustrated by a branch sales manager closes alerts that implicate the manager's own high-value clients, not by the stated activity involving an AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a revenue-generating….

B:

When testing the contrasting pattern of an AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a…, remember that an approved restriction has little effect unless screening and approval workflows enforce it. A case of a board approves restricted correspondent banking but sales continues to onboard nested-payment… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is an AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a revenue-generating….

D:

Against the reported situation in which an AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a…, internal audit must be able to evaluate controls objectively rather than audit its own operational design. This would change the core risk being assessed from an AML department has written procedures but no authority to challenge a revenue-generating… to internal audit designs the transaction monitoring rules it must later assess.

Question 165

A senior reviewer is asked to classify this pattern: An international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing customer or activity differences. Which interpretation is best supported?

  1. Confusion between compulsory law-enforcement searches and voluntary sharing
  2. EU AML reform and phased applicability risk
  3. Financial inclusion risk from indiscriminate de-risking
  4. Country-risk de-risking without proportional assessment

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Higher geographic risk may warrant stronger safeguards, not necessarily indiscriminate exclusion. Unlike a matter involving a firm's US manager sends data requested under an informal private-sector network as if it…, this case turns on the pattern described in the referral.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Section 314(a) requests and eligible 314(b) exchanges have distinct legal bases and safeguards; the observed record here instead involves an international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing…. That mechanism is illustrated by a firm's US manager sends data requested under an informal private-sector network as if it were a…, not by the stated activity involving an international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing customer or….

B:

Against the reported situation in which an international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing…, new EU measures require tracking institutions, effective dates, and the scope of directly applicable and national rules. A case of an EU financial group assumes a policy written before the 2024 AML regulatory package will remain… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is an international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing customer or….

C:

The relevant alternative mechanism is different from an international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing…: Treating an entire population as unacceptable can exclude lawful customers without evidence-based assessment. The prerequisite pattern differs: a remittance company blocks all low-income migrant customers because enhanced checks cost more than…. The question instead describes an international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing customer or….

Question 166

This unusual pattern is reported in a financial institution: A US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact spelling alone. Which exposure is most directly indicated?

  1. OFAC sanctions identification and ownership risk
  2. Public-private intelligence-sharing privacy risk
  3. Overgeneralization of sanctions jurisdiction and reach
  4. Country-risk de-risking without proportional assessment

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Restrictions may reach parties based on applicable ownership rules and identifying attributes. The distinguishing facts concern a US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact spelling alone; the competing interpretation would require evidence of banks and investigators create a public-private forum but share raw customer data without a….

Incorrect Answers

B:

The relevant alternative mechanism is different from a US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact…: Cooperation goals do not alone authorize disclosure of confidential or personal information. A case of banks and investigators create a public-private forum but share raw customer data without a… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is a US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact spelling alone.

C:

Compared with the stated facts about a US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact…, sanctions regimes differ in jurisdictional nexus, restrictions, exemptions, and ownership criteria. The prerequisite pattern differs: a regional payments company deploys one global sanctions rule without checking local territorial…. The question instead describes a US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact spelling alone.

D:

This is not the central mechanism when a US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact…; higher geographic risk may warrant stronger safeguards, not necessarily indiscriminate exclusion. This would change the core risk being assessed from a US firm assumes every person on an OFAC sanctions list can be screened by exact spelling alone to an international bank rejects all payments from a high-risk country without assessing customer or….

Question 167

A control gap has come to light: An overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase without naming the actual buyer. What is the central financial-crime risk behind it?

  1. Fictitious professional-fee laundering risk
  2. Legal gatekeeper beneficial-owner concealment
  3. Real-estate client-account opacity
  4. Crowdfunding beneficiary and end-use opacity

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Professional intermediary accounts can obscure the true source and beneficiary of acquisition funds. For the supported action of real-estate client-account opacity in this risk interpretation review involving an overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase without…, unlike a matter involving a professional service provider invoices an offshore entity for vague advisory work…, this case turns on the pattern described in the referral.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This is not the central mechanism when an overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase…; unverifiable services can provide a documentary justification for movements of illicit funds. This would change the core risk being assessed from an overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase without naming… to a professional service provider invoices an offshore entity for vague advisory work followed by….

B:

When testing the contrasting pattern of an overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase…, remember that professional formation services can be used to obscure the person exercising effective control. The alternative requires the facts represented by a legal adviser forms companies for a client while refusing to disclose the person providing…; the principal facts instead show an overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase without naming….

D:

Against the reported situation in which an overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase…, rapid collection and withdrawal can obscure the beneficiaries of otherwise legitimate donations. A case of a nonprofit fundraiser channels emergency donations through an opaque crowdfunding account and… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is an overseas investor uses a lawyer's client account to settle a property purchase without naming….

Question 168

This unusual pattern is reported in a financial institution: A payments engine screens only the recipient name while ignoring originator and intermediary information in incoming messages. Which exposure is most directly indicated?

  1. Payment-message field coverage gap
  2. Incomplete ongoing sanctions rescreening population
  3. Sanctions screening threshold calibration imbalance
  4. Static periodic review misses material customer events

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Restricted parties can appear in relevant message fields other than the final beneficiary. This classification follows the described behavior; the different example of a daily sanctions batch screens active customers but excludes recently changed beneficial… would raise a different primary exposure.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The relevant alternative mechanism is different from a payments engine screens only the recipient name while ignoring originator and…: Legal-entity ownership changes can create new indirect exposure even without customer name changes. The alternative requires the facts represented by a daily sanctions batch screens active customers but excludes recently changed beneficial owners; the principal facts instead show a payments engine screens only the recipient name while ignoring originator and intermediary….

C:

Compared with the stated facts about a payments engine screens only the recipient name while ignoring originator and…, overly broad matching may create operational overload that hides important true matches. That mechanism is illustrated by a fuzzy sanctions matcher produces overwhelming false hits and analysts cannot clear them within…, not by the stated activity involving a payments engine screens only the recipient name while ignoring originator and intermediary….

D:

This is not the central mechanism when a payments engine screens only the recipient name while ignoring originator and…; long fixed intervals can leave profiles stale when control or activity changes abruptly. A case of a bank performs KYC refresh only once every five years for high-risk businesses despite major… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is a payments engine screens only the recipient name while ignoring originator and intermediary….

Question 169

A senior reviewer is asked to classify this pattern: A payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement refunds go to unrelated entities. Which interpretation is best supported?

  1. Insurance investment-policy laundering exposure
  2. Concentrated ownership behind distributed insurance placements
  3. Merchant misrepresentation and payment-laundering risk
  4. Fraud and laundering through claims disbursement

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A merchant's visible business may mask payments routed for undisclosed third parties. The specific risk is grounded in a payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement refunds go to…, not in the alternative scenario of a customer buys a large life policy using a third party and requests early surrender….

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unusual third-party premium funding and economically irrational surrender can convert funds into insurer payouts; the observed record here instead involves a payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement…. That mechanism is illustrated by a customer buys a large life policy using a third party and requests early surrender despite steep…, not by the stated activity involving a payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement refunds go to….

B:

Against the reported situation in which a payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement…, separate policyholders may conceal a common source of funds and correlated exposure. A case of an insurance broker proposes many single-premium policies purchased by entities with the same… would support that classification; here the relevant evidence is a payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement refunds go to….

D:

Compared with the stated facts about a payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement…, unrelated beneficiaries may receive fabricated or diverted claim proceeds. This would change the core risk being assessed from a payment processor onboards merchants whose websites sell one product but settlement refunds go to… to a motor-insurance intermediary sends claim payments to accounts not linked to insured persons or….

Question 170

An AFC specialist is reviewing this situation: A board pack reports alert volumes but omits false positives, overdue cases, and filing timeliness. What is the most precise risk interpretation?

  1. Unvalidated policy content imported from a third party
  2. Misleading AML management information mix
  3. Weak committee terms of reference
  4. Disconnected operational and financial-crime risk management

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Raw workload counts do not show whether controls are effective or regulatory obligations are met. This classification follows the described behavior; the different example of a bank adopts a vendor's proposed policy wording without review of local reporting law would raise a different primary exposure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

External templates may omit entity-specific legal requirements or risk characteristics; the observed record here instead involves a board pack reports alert volumes but omits false positives, overdue cases, and…. That mechanism is illustrated by a bank adopts a vendor's proposed policy wording without review of local reporting law, not by the stated activity involving a board pack reports alert volumes but omits false positives, overdue cases, and filing timeliness.

C:

The relevant alternative mechanism is different from a board pack reports alert volumes but omits false positives, overdue cases, and…: Meetings alone do not establish delegated authority, quorum, escalation paths, or accountability. The prerequisite pattern differs: a risk committee meets quarterly but has no formal mandate or named decision powers. The question instead describes a board pack reports alert volumes but omits false positives, overdue cases, and filing timeliness.

D:

Compared with the stated facts about a board pack reports alert volumes but omits false positives, overdue cases, and…, technology disruption can create transaction-monitoring gaps with AML consequences. This would change the core risk being assessed from a board pack reports alert volumes but omits false positives, overdue cases, and filing timeliness to operational risk owns vendor outages but never shares payment-data disruptions with AML monitoring.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition) (CAMS) Practice Tests